Favorite posts

Below are the posts of mine that I personally consider to be most important on various topics.

9/11 in general:

• My main reasons for being suspicious about 9/11 – December 20, 2007
• My current views on 9/11 – brief summary – April 13, 2008

Destruction of the World Trade Center:

• Demolition of WTC: Let’s not overstate the case, please – November 20, 2007
• Engineers were surprised by the WTC collapses – December 7, 2007
• Richard Gage’s avowed enemy, part 2 – and my thoughts about WTC 7 – February 28, 2008
• Time to get serious about proving “assisted collapse” of WTC buildings – March 12, 2008

9/11 and me:

• What happened in my life on 9/11/2001 – December 10, 2007
• The 9/11 Truth movement and me: Further reply to Pat Curley – November 22, 2007
• A brief history of my interaction with official-story defenders, as of February 2008 – March 6, 2008

The 9/11 Truth movement and the “political spectrum”:

• The 9/11 Truth movement needs a more visible, better organized left wing! – September 29, 2007
• 9/11 Truth movement conservatives, please stand up now – October 23, 2007
• Are you a paleoconservative? Find out! – September 30, 2007

Counteracting religion-based bigotry:

• The recent growth of anti-Illuminism: Dreadful ideology about the dreaded Illuminati – October 12, 2007
• More about anti-Illuminism – October 17, 2007
• Agent-baiting, guilt by association, and religious bigotry – October 27, 2007
• Taking responsibility for counteracting bigotry in our midst – November 4, 2007
• Please do NOT trust Eustace Mullins as an authority on the Federal Reserve System! – December 23, 2007

Various issues within the 9/11 Truth movement:

• Pentagon no-757 theories: debunkings from within the 9/11 Truth movement – October 4, 2007
• Identifying disinformation agents? – October 26, 2007

To leftist opponents of the 9/11 Truth movement:

• Chip Berlet and “Conspiracism” – October 14, 2007

Comment quarantines: The posts and categories below are intended as designated places for certain kinds of comments that I’d like to try to keep out of other comment threads. (See my comment policy.)

• A priori objections by official-story defenders, including arguments from authority (when used in an a priori manner), the “someone would have talked” and “too many people” arguments (when used as a categorical dismissal of all inside-job or government complicity hypotheses, or as a categorical dismissal of all air-defense slowdown or WTC demolition hypotheses), and questions about possible motives for 9/11 as inside job. (Exception: A priori arguments from authority may also be discussed in posts in the epistemology category.)
• No-planes theories
• General gripe thread – about the 9/11 Truth movement (the place to post general gripes not directly relevant to any specific post)
• blog policy and comment policy (the place to complain about my comment policy or other blog policies, if you want ask me to modify them)