I posted a comment on the “Screw Loose Change” blog calling attention to my post about “Screw Loose Change” dissing the NYC-CAN.
I got some rather rude replies which I won’t discuss, except to mention that Pat Curley needs to remind his fans again to clean up their “potty mouth,” as he and/or James have put it in the past.
Now to some more substantive replies, by one “Patrick from Cincinnati”:
Screw Loose Change has been pouring scorn (here
and here) on NYC-CAN’s ballot initiative. The SLC folks assume that the NYC government’s legal challenges are valid and irrefutable, and that we stupid “troofers” just didn’t even bother to look at the election law, or hire a lawyer.
 | psikeyhackr on Time to get serious about prov… |
 | crankydad on Preliminary reply to “na… |
| psikeyhackr on To psikeyhackr: Belated replie… |
| psikeyhackr on The force exerted by the falli… |
| psikeyhackr on The force exerted by the falli… |
 | patricksmcnally on Dennis Kucinich’s articl… |
| psikeyhackr on The force exerted by the falli… |
| patricksmcnally on Ted Gunderson, fake whistleblo… |
 | Diane on Ted Gunderson, fake whistleblo… |
| patricksmcnally on Ted Gunderson, fake whistleblo… |
| Diane on To “debunkers” |
 | tanabear on To “debunkers” |
| Reply to “Patr… on “9/11: Press for Truth… | |
| Reply to “Patr… on “Screw Loose Change… | |
| patricksmcnally on “Screw Loose Change… |
New York City activist 