Needed: More scientists and engineers. And more teamwork. And better peer review.
I just now heard about the following, on 911blogger: A Proposal for Proving Controlled Demolition in a Civil Negligence Suit Against the Security Groups Responsible for the WTC.
In my opinion, this is WAY premature. We are NOT yet anywhere near ready to prove any such thing in a court of law, not even in a civil case.
(more…)
 | psikeyhackr on Time to get serious about prov… |
 | crankydad on Preliminary reply to “na… |
| psikeyhackr on To psikeyhackr: Belated replie… |
| psikeyhackr on The force exerted by the falli… |
| psikeyhackr on The force exerted by the falli… |
 | patricksmcnally on Dennis Kucinich’s articl… |
| psikeyhackr on The force exerted by the falli… |
| patricksmcnally on Ted Gunderson, fake whistleblo… |
 | Diane on Ted Gunderson, fake whistleblo… |
| patricksmcnally on Ted Gunderson, fake whistleblo… |
| Diane on To “debunkers” |
 | tanabear on To “debunkers” |
| Reply to “Patr… on “9/11: Press for Truth… | |
| Reply to “Patr… on “Screw Loose Change… | |
| patricksmcnally on “Screw Loose Change… |
New York City activist 